‘The Trial of Jane Fonda’ is set in Waterbury, Connecticut
in 1988 where we are enriched with the actress, Jane Fonda who is meeting a
number of Vietnam vets who are striving to prevent her latest film project, ‘Stanley
and Iris’ from being filmed in their area. The meeting is held in the church
hall where Reverend John Clarke is coordinating the discussion where five other
men, Buzzy Banks, Joe Cellano II, Larry Bank (Alex Gaumond), Reggie Wells (Ako
Mitchell) and Tommy Lee Cook (Mark Rose) are reluctantly sat there where they’re
demanding answers from Jane as to why she deceived her nation and the armed
forces. Throughout the course of the performance, we see that the former
soldiers are verbally aggressive towards Jane, specifically from Buzzy and Joe
as they feel that she has betrayed the thousands of American servicemen who had
died in the war. However, Jane makes it clear that the president at the time,
President Nixon lied to the people of the United States of America as he has
been plotting to bomb Vietnam’s lifeline of dykes which would ultimately make
them completely unable to strengthen themselves. As such; she makes it clear
that a gargantuan amount of innocent men, women and children perished in this
unjust war. There is so much conflict that arises from Jane and the men and
their actions towards her are rather inappropriate and deplorable where they
deface some of the memorabilia that features Jane Fonda’s face on it such as a
toilet seat and a poster from a previous film of hers. Over the duration of the
war, we learn that Jane stopped working as an actress so that she could fully concentrate
on her campaigns against the Vietnam War in which she gathered support from
university students and to the hippies, and from her conversations she begins
to obtain a microscopic level of respect from the ex-soldiers and it appears
that Reverend John Clarke has a lot to thank Jane Fonda for as he found a new
path which is to follow the work of the Lord God. You can visualise how
barbaric the Vietnam War from both sides as we are informed that Reggie was
left paralysed from a bomb that was left from a Vietnamese child so we can see
why they are not happy with Jane’s support to the Vietnamese people. There’s a
moment when Jane explains that she was manipulated by army officials where she
was pictured sitting on a North Vietnamese anti-aircraft gun where she was
belly laughing which was to convey that she did support Nixon’s decision to
bomb the country of Vietnam. At the finale, Jane and the soldiers appear to
have settled their differences and in actual fact some of those who supported
their place in the war soon change their opinion and when Jane walks out of the
church hall, her filmic location is given the greenlight. Jastrow’s narrative is definitely an
informative piece of artistry on an actress who campaigned against Nixon and
the Vietnam War and how war veterans challenged her in quite an uncomfortable
manner, yet there are some sticky and stilted moments that made the plot a
little less cohesive.
One found the performances by the company of, ‘The Trial of
Jane Fonda’ to be accurately appealing as they encapsulated the awkward reality
of Jane Fonda’s disapproval of the Vietnam War, in addition there is a great
balance of tension that exacerbates through the ex-soldiers. Anne Archer is fascinating
as the lead protagonist, Jane Fonda; essentially how awesome and factual she
looks as the actress and the build up to how she was manipulated by the
American Army, also there are places with the veterans where she comes across
as the victim rather than the bull. Martin Fisher is likable as Reverend John
Clarke; generally where we see that he in fact presents a more calm and
collected individual who has more reverence for Jane Fonda than his place in
the war as she enabled him to follow his path now, also I liked when he kicked
the soldiers out for their disgusting actions. Paul Herzberg is suitable as the
brash, Joe Cellano II; exclusively at the moments where he finds it testing
that he is being forced to re-examine whether the Vietnam War was a good thing,
then again, I found that the he came across quite frighteningly by his
treatment towards Jane Fonda which could signify a little bit of male chauvinism
and a small element of domestic harm. Christien Anholt is impressive as Buzzy
Banks; primarily where we see that how conflicting he is and with Jane Fonda’s
presence in the church hall makes him somewhat shudders and squirm as with all
the other men, he has an obvious problem that the woman was correct and their
President was in the wrong.
Joe Harmston’s direction is pleasant to a point here as he
has tried to depict to us that the legendary actress that is, Jane Fonda proposed
to testify against a war that obliterated American soldiers and Vietnamese civilians
and this comes across due to the increased rigidity from the vets and Jane
herself, but there could have been more tightness in the actual flow, yet it is
a fine effort. Sean Cavanagh’s set design and Roberto Surace’s costume design are
smart as the set consisted of a backdrop of the American flag and with Louise
Rhoades-Brown’s video projection design that features footage of speeches from
Nixon and the war it helps us understand the conflict a lot more. Overall, the
experience of, ‘The Trial of Jane Fonda’ was a somewhat enchanting story which
Jane Fonda was apprehensive about having a moment in her life being made into a
play, but it was good to see how Nixon was a scheming man who did not care
about the impending chaos.
No comments:
Post a Comment