Once again, another production from Islington's Almeida
Theatre has transferred to the West End. This time, we are welcomed with Mike
Barlett's latest play, ‘King Charles III’, and one thought that the writing was
not as enthralling; however the performances are vastly appealing. ‘King Charles
III’ is a futuristic play that portrays the events after the demise of Queen
Elizabeth II, and how Prince Charles is finally being allowed to reign over
United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. The timing of Charles's supremacy is faced
with glitches from the outset as King Charles III and the country's current
Prime Minister, Mr Evans appears increasingly oppressed. Furthermore, the performance
conveys the question whether Charles is appropriate to rule the country, or
should he abdicate so so that Prince William can become the monarch of our
great nation. Charles inevitably makes a humongous amount of mistakes during
this time on the throne; such as not allowing the Prime Minister to walk away
with a willing signature on changes to the law, meeting with the leader of the
opposition and the eventual dissolving of Parliament. In addition, ‘King
Charles III’ invites us to witness the conniving nature that both Prince
William and Kate possess so that they will command the country, and we see them
conjuring a plan to ensure that Charles abdicates, in collaboration with the Prime
Minister. This ultimately instigates a somewhat bitter contension between them
and Charles and Camilla. The friction is emancipated when Charles is faced with
this treacherous stipulation. One thinks that the play is to devise a negative
representation of the Royal family, in particular the approaches Charles has to
protect himself and Buckingham Palace, with excessive protection of the armed
forces and the ridiculous position of a tank outside the palace itself.
Barlett's narrative is not that satisfying and some moments are inadequate; such
as the ghostly figure of Charles’ first wife, Lady Diana Spencer, or as we know
as the elegant humanitarian Princess Diana. Paradoxically, a number of aspects
were slightly amusing, which pleased me immensely. The performances by the company
or ‘King Charles III’ were delightful and captured the spirit of the Royal
family. Tim Pigott-Smith is sublime as the slightly cantankerous and idiotic,
King Charles III. One thought he encapsulated an old man who is desperate to
have his chance of running to a pleasing and watchable standard. Adam James is
gracious as the British Prime Minister, Mr Evans, in particular when his
frustration becomes apparent when Charles appears confrontational when explains
that the monarch should not obtain enormous power. Oliver Chris and Lydia
Wilson are intriguing as the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. I enjoyed how
vindictive they were in their quest to become the crowned heads of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Rupert Goold's direction is courteous
as he is summarised the fictitious nature of the Royal family and their
secretive quarrels excellent standard of precision. Thomas Scutt’s design is
outstanding as he has crafted a regal atmosphere with tenacity and ease, and I
found it quite mesmerising actually. Overall, one found the experience of ‘King
Charles III’ to be an affable one.
No comments:
Post a Comment